Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effect of an education program on improving knowledge of schizophrenia among parents of junior and senior high school students in Japan

  • Hatsumi Yoshii1Email author,
  • Yuichiro Watanabe2,
  • Hideaki Kitamura2,
  • Jun Chen1 and
  • Kouhei Akazawa1
BMC Public Health201111:323

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-323

Received: 14 December 2010

Accepted: 17 May 2011

Published: 17 May 2011

Abstract

Background

Early detection and intervention in schizophrenia are important in improving quality of life after treatment and are major issues in psychiatric care. Therefore, it is necessary to increase knowledge of schizophrenia among the general public. Among parents of junior and senior high school students in Japan, we compared rates of correct answers for items on knowledge of schizophrenia and ability to discriminate this psychosis from other disorders on questionnaires given before and after viewing a web-based education program.

Methods

Questionnaires were distributed to 2,690 parents. The program was developed to help parents obtain a basic understanding of schizophrenia and to emphasize the necessity of early detection.

Results

Before the program, the rate of correct answers was 77% for items concerning basic knowledge of schizophrenia, 47% for "discrimination of schizophrenia symptoms," and 30% for "discrimination of prodromal symptoms." The program resulted in an improvement in basic knowledge of schizophrenia, discrimination of schizophrenia symptoms, and discrimination of prodromal symptoms (P < 0.001 for all).

Conclusions

Our web-based education program was useful in helping parents acquire a basic knowledge of schizophrenia and discriminate correctly the symptoms of schizophrenia.

Background

Delayed detection of schizophrenia and the resulting prolongation of the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) are viewed as serious issues in the mental health field [13]. The median DUP has been estimated at between 1 and 2 years [4, 5], and a prolonged DUP has been associated with delayed remission, increased risk of suicide, substance abuse, and an unfavourable prognosis [68].

Studies have revealed a number of important factors related to delayed detection of schizophrenia [913]. One is lack of basic knowledge of the symptoms of the disease [912]. Those without an understanding of the symptoms of schizophrenia may miss the onset of the illness in people close to them.

Providing accurate information on schizophrenia is essential in preventing delays in diagnosis. In particular, parents of adolescents need to have sufficient knowledge of the disorder so they can identify an initial episode in their children. The onset of schizophrenia is typically between ages 15 and 25 years in males and between ages 25 and 35 years in females [4]. However, individuals are likely to experience their first psychotic symptoms before age 20 [14]. If parents are able to identify the symptoms of schizophrenia at an early stage, they are more likely to seek appropriate medical care for their children [1, 7].

In recent years, several sophisticated educational programs have been developed to provide basic information, under appropriate conditions, on schizophrenia and its associated behaviours to various populations [1517]. However, there have been no studies regarding the effectiveness of such programs among parents of junior and senior high school students. In this study, we use a multifaceted questionnaire to evaluate knowledge of schizophrenia. Furthermore, we investigate the effectiveness of a web-based education program that aimed to improve understanding of schizophrenia among 2,690 Japanese parents of adolescents.

Methods

Setting and participants

The participants were extracted from a large database of 1,370,000 candidates that is administered by a Japanese private company specializing in questionnaire research. First, we extracted 44,000 parents of junior and senior high school students, all registered in the database. Second, gender and region were used as variables for stratified random sampling. Finally, 5,000 final candidates were extracted. Thus, the gender and region distributions of our sample were almost identical to those of the Japanese general population. Of the 5,000 candidates, 1,410 parents of junior high school students and 1,280 parents of senior high school students participated in this survey (the "first survey"). All respondents completed a questionnaire on an internet website that was newly developed for this study by the survey company. To evaluate the reliability of the first survey, we performed another survey of basic knowledge of schizophrenia and ability to discriminate it from other disorders in the same manner as the first survey. We used the same questionnaire for a different sample of 735 individuals who had not viewed our web-based education program (the "second survey"). All respondents were Japanese adults living in Japan. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Niigata University.

Questionnaire

The questionnaire used in the present study consisted of 3 sections. Section 1 collected demographic information on respondents including age, occupation, education attainment, and family structure (Table 1). Section 2 comprised 14 true/false items on basic knowledge of schizophrenia that were developed for this study. The items addressed the causes, symptoms, incidence rate, and treatment of schizophrenia (Table 2). Section 3 examined the ability to discriminate schizophrenia symptoms from those of other disorders (Appendix I). It was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for schizophrenia and the PRIME Screen [18]. The PRIME Screen is an assessment instrument used to identify, at an early stage, subjects with prodromal symptoms. The questionnaire comprised 4 items on schizophrenia symptoms, 4 on prodromal symptoms, 4 on other mental illnesses, 2 on physical disorders, and 4 items on individuals who display unusual or antisocial behaviour. The respondents answered Sections 2 and 3 twice, before and after the education program (referred to as the "before" questionnaire and "after" questionnaire, respectively).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of respondents (n = 2,690)

Characteristic

n

%

Demographic characteristics

of parents in Japan (%)*

Age (years)

   

30-39

221

8.2

31.2

40-49

1,904

70.8

37.6

50-59

548

20.4

14.0

60-69

17

0.6

5.5

Others

0

0

11.7

Gender

   

Male

1,381

51.3

 

Female

1,309

48.7

 

Education

   

Junior high school

25

0.9

9.7

High school

766

28.5

55.0

Vocational school

349

13.0

8.25

Junior college

385

14.3

8.25

University

1,063

39.5

17.15

Graduate school

96

3.6

1.1

Others

6

0.2

0.55

Family structure

   

2 parents

2,092

77.8

69.0

1 parent

89

3.3

7.0

3 generations

466

17.3

19.8

Others

43

1.6

4.2

Family income

   

(US dollars)

   

< 11,000

41

1.5

1.5

11,000-32,000

196

7.3

12.8

32,000-53,000

502

18.7

21.8

53,000-110,000

1,465

54.5

47.6

> 110,000

486

18.0

16.3

Proximity to person with schizophrenia

   

Yes

88

3.3

 

No

2,602

96.7

 

Occupation

   

Agriculture, forestry and fisheries

11

0.4

2.6

Production labour service

631

23.5

18.8

Transportation and communication

141

5.2

14.1

Sales and marketing

349

13.0

32.6

Service industry

340

12.6

9.4

Professionals

482

17.9

21.1

Others

160

6.0

1.2

Unemployed

576

21.4

0.2

Participation in welfare activities for people with mental illness

   

Yes

222

8.3

 

No

2468

91.7

 

* The Cabinet Office: http://www8.cao.go.jp/youth/kenkyu.htm

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare:http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/list/20-21.html

Table 2

Rates (%) of correct answers for the 14 items on basic knowledge of schizophrenia

Item

Correct

answer

"before"

( n = 2,690)

"after"

( n = 2,465)

P

1. The incidence of schizophrenia is 1 out of 100 individuals.

True

9.9

33.8

< 0.001

2. Junior and senior high school students do not develop schizophrenia.

False

99.1

98.4

< 0.05

3. Schizophrenia is not a mental illness.

False

93.8

90.7

< 0.001

4. Differences in child-rearing methods are not responsible for the onset of the illness.

True

20.5

35.5

< 0.001

5. A person with a mild disposition will not necessarily develop schizophrenia.

True

29.2

34.6

< 0.001

6. Schizophrenia has been proven to be a genetic disease.

False

97.7

97.7

NS

7. A person with schizophrenia may have little will power.

False

97.4

96.8

NS

8. There is no effective medication for schizophrenia.

False

94.1

95.3

< 0.05

9. It is not possible to recover from schizophrenia, even with treatment.

False

97.8

98.1

NS

10. Auditory hallucinations and delusions are not symptoms of schizophrenia.

False

97.9

97.9

NS

11. Poor concentration and fatigue are not symptoms of schizophrenia.

False

98.0

98.1

NS

12. Social withdrawal is not a symptom of schizophrenia.

False

92.8

95.3

< 0.001

13. The appearance and duration of symptoms can vary among individuals.

True

65.7

61.7

< 0.05

14. All the above items are incorrect.

False

83.8

85.8

< 0.05

Total score

 

77.0

80.0

< 0.001

Web-based education program

After the "before" questionnaire survey was conducted, all respondents were invited to view a web-based education program that had been developed to increase understanding of schizophrenia, after which the "after" questionnaire survey was conducted using the same questionnaire for the same respondents. The content of the education program consisted of 10 units: (1) characteristics of schizophrenia, (2) causes of schizophrenia, (3) symptoms of schizophrenia, (4) classification of schizophrenia, (5) course of the disease and its characteristic clinical features, (6) treatment of schizophrenia, (7) prognosis, (8) how to prevent progression and exacerbation of the disorder, (9) signs of progression, and (10) consultation facilities.

The slide show included 12 slides with narration and required 13 minutes to complete. The media were delivered via the same internet website that was used for the questionnaire survey. The effectiveness of the education program was evaluated by the same respondents 1 week later.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. McNemar's test was used to compare the proportion of specific answers in paired data, that is, the results of the "before" and "after" questionnaires for each respondent. An unpaired t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare the effect of the web-based education program on basic knowledge of schizophrenia and the ability to discriminate it from other disorders among several groups of demographic characteristics. The endpoint was the correct answer score, calculated by dividing the sum of the differences between the answers (correct = 1 and incorrect = 0) for the "after" questionnaire and those for the "before" questionnaire for all respondents by the number of items (i.e. 14). All statistical tests were 2-tailed, and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of respondents

In total, 2,690 of the 5,000 individuals completed the "before" questionnaire, and 2,465 completed the "after" questionnaire after viewing the education program. Mean age ± standard deviation at questionnaire completion was 45.9 ± 4.7 years, and approximately 71% of the respondents were in their 40 s (Table 1). The 2,690 respondents included 1,381 (51.3%) men and 1,309 (48.7%) women. Regarding educational attainment, 1,159 (43.1%) respondents had completed university or graduate school. A total of 2,092 (77.8%) respondents reported being part of a 2-parent household. The majority of respondents (54.5%) reported a family income of 53,000 to 110,000 US dollars. Eighty-eight (3.3%) reported living close to someone with schizophrenia. For reference, selected corresponding demographic characteristics of parents in the Japanese general population are shown in Table 1.

Basic knowledge of schizophrenia

Table 2 shows the rate of correct answers on the questionnaires given before and after the education program for the 14 items on basic knowledge of schizophrenia. In the "before" questionnaire, all items except numbers 1, 4, 5, and 13 had a rate of correct answers higher than 90%. The item with the lowest rate (9.9%) of correct answers was number 1, which asked about the incidence of schizophrenia. Other items with a low rate of correct answers were numbers 4 and 5 (20.5% and 29.2%, respectively). These findings revealed that respondents were unaware that child-rearing methods and personality are not responsible for the onset of schizophrenia. The identical questionnaire was administered after the respondents had viewed the education program on the same website. For six items--1, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 14--the rates of correct answers on the "after" questionnaire were significantly higher than those on the "before" questionnaire. The extent of the change in correct answer rates after viewing the web-based education program was analysed among several categories of demographic variables using the unpaired t-test and ANOVA. Significant differences in correct answer scores were associated with age, gender, education, and participation in welfare activities for people with mental illness (Table 3). The results of the second survey, which was administered to evaluate the reliability of the results of the first survey, are shown in Appendix II (Tables 5 and 6).
Table 3

Demographic characteristics and correct answer scores for basic knowledge of schizophrenia and discrimination between other disorders

 

Basic knowledge of

schizophrenia

Discrimination

between disorders

 

Mean ± SD

P**

Mean ± SD

P**

Age (years)

 

0.019

 

0.050

30-39

0.51 ± 2.03

 

1.48 ± 4.36

 

40-49

0.36 ± 1.95

 

0.71 ± 4.32

 

50-59

0.66 ± 1.96

 

1.13 ± 4.45

 

60-69

0.81 ± 2.20

 

0.81 ± 5.23

 

Gender

 

0.001

 

0.156

Male

0.57 ± 1.95

 

0.97 ± 4.28

 

Female

0.28 ± 1.97

 

0.72 ± 4.45

 

Education

 

0.021

 

0.001

Junior high school

1.81 ± 1.40

 

2.33 ± 2.89

 

High school

0.45 ± 1.94

 

1.34 ± 4.26

 

Vocational school

0.41 ± 1.95

 

1.14 ± 4.45

 

Junior college

0.23 ± 1.98

 

0.52 ± 4.44

 

University

0.48 ± 1.98

 

0.64 ± 4.37

 

Graduate school

0.49 ± 2.03

 

-0.26 ± 4.26

 

Others

1.00 ± 1.00

 

0.00 ± 4.18

 

Family structure

 

0.603

 

0.019

2 parents

0.44 ± 1.95

 

0.82 ± 4.35

 

1 parent

0.16 ± 1.87

 

0.40 ± 5.04

 

3 generations

0.50 ± 2.00

 

1.26 ± 4.32

 

Others

0.40 ± 2.25

 

-0.69 ± 3.48

 

Family income (US dollars)

 

0.154

 

0.003

< 11,000

1.00 ± 2.01

 

0.46 ± 4.88

 

11,000-32,000

0.67 ± 1.79

 

1.72 ± 4.80

 

32,000-53,000

0.48 ± 2.01

 

1.28 ± 4.28

 

53,000-110,000

0.39 ± 1.98

 

0.75 ± 4.23

 

> 110,000

0.41 ± 1.93

 

0.45 ± 4.51

 

Proximity to person with schizophrenia

 

0.056

 

0.004

Yes

0.04 ± 2.03

 

-0.48 ± 5.01

 

No

0.45 ± 1.96

 

0.91 ± 4.33

 

Occupation

 

0.167

 

0.001

Agriculture, forestry and fisheries

1.00 ± 1.63

 

3.30 ± 3.77

 

Production labour service

0.6 ± 1.96

 

0.96 ± 4.20

 

Transportation and communication

0.66 ± 2.14

 

1.16 ± 4.22

 

Sales and marketing

0.48 ± 2.02

 

0.94 ± 4.44

 

Service industry

0.41 ± 1.92

 

1.34 ± 4.57

 

Professionals

0.28 ± 1.92

 

0.07 ± 4.41

 

Others

0.56 ± 1.88

 

1.23 ± 3.75

 

Unemployed

0.27 ± 1.97

 

0.84 ± 4.42

 

Participation in welfare activities for people with mental illness

 

0.001

 

0.193

Yes

-0.14 ± 2.02

 

0.48 ± 4.60

 

No

0.49 ± 1.95

 

0.89 ± 4.33

 

* Correct answer scores were calculated by dividing the sum of the differences between the answers (correct = 1 and incorrect = 0) on the "after" questionnaire with those on the "before" questionnaire for all respondents by the number of items.

** Student's or Welch's t-test, One-way analysis of variance.

Rates of discrimination between disorders

We evaluated the rates of correct answers for the questionnaire section on discriminating between schizophrenia symptoms and other disorders (Table 4). The lowest rates of correct answers in the "before" questionnaire were for discrimination of prodromal symptoms (30%) and discrimination of schizophrenia symptoms (47%), indicating that respondents lacked knowledge of the symptoms of schizophrenia and its prodromal phase. For discrimination of other mental illnesses, physical disorders, and individuals who display unusual or antisocial behaviour, the respective rates of correct answers were 65%, 93%, and 93%. However, the percentage of correct answers on the "after" questionnaire improved to 61% for both discrimination of prodromal symptoms and discrimination of schizophrenia symptoms. McNemar's test revealed that these increases were statistically significant. The unpaired t-test and ANOVA indicated that five variables--education, family structure, family income, proximity to a person with schizophrenia, and occupation--were associated with significant differences in the means of correct answer scores (Table 3). The results of the second survey are shown in Appendix III (Table 7).
Table 4

Rates (%) of correct answers for 5 items on discrimination between disorders

Item

"before"

"after"

P*

Discrimination of schizophrenia symptoms

47

61

< 0.001

Discrimination of prodromal symptoms

30

61

< 0.001

Discrimination of other mental illnesses

65

61

< 0.01

Discrimination of physical disorders

93

89

< 0.001

Discrimination of individuals who display unusual or antisocial behaviour

93

88

< 0.001

*McNemar's test

Discussion

We developed an experimental web-based education program to aid the parents of adolescents in quickly acquiring a broad knowledge of schizophrenia. In particular, we focused on knowledge regarding detection of the prodromal stage and symptoms of the disorder. Parents were able to browse the content of the program on an internet website at a time of their convenience and learn about schizophrenia, including its characteristics, causes, symptoms, classification, treatments, and prognosis. Our education program has two important features. The first is that the information was condensed so it could be presented on only 12 slides viewed over a period of 13 minutes. This allowed participants to focus on the content and understand the essential points regarding schizophrenia. Second, we limited enrolment to parents of adolescents. Because the first symptoms of schizophrenia typically appear in adolescence [19, 20], implementation of such a program for parents would be ideal for early detection and subsequent intervention for the disorder.

Knowledge of schizophrenia

We attempted to measure participants' basic knowledge of schizophrenia. On the "before" questionnaire, the rate of correct answers for this section was 77%, indicating that the parents of junior and senior high school students were already knowledgeable about schizophrenia before viewing the education program. The education program resulted in a small improvement in basic knowledge, an increase of 3% (P < 0.001). Although the methods, participants, and results for education programs differ, many previous studies have shown that basic knowledge of schizophrenia is improved by such programs. Comptom et al. showed that a 40-hour training program for a crisis intervention team of 159 police officers in Atlanta resulted in a relative increase of 16%, from an average of 6.4 to 7.4 points, on a survey of general knowledge regarding schizophrenia [21]. Furthermore, a Japanese study suggested that some education programs for workers significantly improved knowledge of the effectiveness of drugs (before, 11.1%-61.3%; after, 33%-100%) [9]. In another study, Stuart [16] created a 20-minute video viewed by 571 Canadian high school students. The video described the signs and symptoms of schizophrenia, using a dramatization of a student worried about a friend's behaviour. Basic knowledge of schizophrenia has also been evaluated by several program sites in the World Psychiatric Association's global anti-stigma program. At baseline, 47.7% (n = 114) of students scored 80% or higher on items related to basic knowledge. This improved to 78.8% (n = 260) of students on the post-test (P < 0.001). As in other studies, enrolment of subjects in the present study was limited. In previous studies, family advocates and mental health consumer groups participated in the education program. In addition, those studies used the real-life experiences of individuals with schizophrenia to illustrate the educational concepts, a method that differs from the one used in the present study.

Discrimination of schizophrenia symptoms

We also attempted to assess knowledge of the symptoms of schizophrenia, (i.e. the ability to differentiate schizophrenia symptoms from those of other disorders). In the present study, the rates of correct answers for items on prodromal symptoms and symptoms of schizophrenia were 30% and 47%, respectively, on the "before" questionnaire. These rates are not high, indicating that Japanese parents of adolescents are unable to discriminate the symptoms of schizophrenia from those of other disorders. Most individuals who develop schizophrenia experience a prodromal stage. In this phase before the initial psychotic episode, many symptoms may be present, including depressed mood, anxiety, irritability, changes in volition, cognitive changes, physical symptoms, behavioural changes, impaired tolerance to normal stress, and attenuated psychotic symptoms. However, common early prodromal symptoms are generally non-specific [4, 7]. Parents of junior and senior high school students must be made aware of both schizophrenia symptoms and prodromal symptoms. Our findings were similar to those of an Italian study [22] which found that although most lay respondents were able to recognize the presence of a pathological condition in a vignette and acknowledge that it required psychiatric treatment, only 21% of them identified the condition as schizophrenia. Inadequate knowledge of schizophrenia, namely, limited ability to discriminate its symptoms, may lead to delayed detection of schizophrenia and prolonged duration of untreated psychosis [6]. After viewing the present education program, there were relative increases of 31% and 14% in the rates of correct answers for the items regarding discrimination of prodromal symptoms and the symptoms of schizophrenia, respectively, on the "after" questionnaire. These findings suggest that education programs can improve the ability to discriminate between schizophrenia and other disorders, and web-based presentations using a limited number of slides in a short time can be effective.

Finally, the present education program might be useful in testing parents of junior and senior high school students from other countries. Findings from such studies would aid in revising the questionnaire.

Conclusions

Our web-based education program was useful in helping parents to acquire a basic knowledge of schizophrenia and discriminate correctly the symptoms of this disorder. The education program can be completed in only 13 minutes. Implementation of our program for parents could assist in early detection and subsequent intervention for schizophrenia.

Appendix I: Discrimination of schizophrenia symptoms

  1. 1.

    The person is not able to take a train because of a racing heart, feeling smothered, dizziness, and/or cold sweats.

     
  2. 2.

    During the third session, the patient becomes frightened, locks the door, and reports being chased by a spy.

     
  3. 3.

    The person feels weak, has a fever and mouth sores, as well as a rash over their entire body.

     
  4. 4.

    I think I might feel like my mind is 'playing tricks' on me.

     
  5. 5.

    The levels of the person's shoulders are different.

     
  6. 6.

    The person will not talk to their parents, takes a defiant attitude toward them, and seems to be hiding something.

     
  7. 7.

    I believe that I have special natural or supernatural gifts beyond my talents and natural strengths.

     
  8. 8.

    The patient has refused to eat for several weeks saying that the food may be poisoned.

     
  9. 9.

    The person has complained for quite a long time, saying that the TV or newspaper is reporting something bad about them.

     
  10. 10.

    The person is not able to feel enthusiasm because of depression and feels that life is hopeless. Also, the person is not able to sleep and has no appetite.

     
  11. 11.

    The person is not able to make decisions without help and is intimidated by parents or teachers.

     
  12. 12.

    The person persists in excessive dieting to decrease or maintain body weight.

     
  13. 13.

    I have thought that it might be possible that other people can read my mind, or that I can read other's minds.

     
  14. 14.

    The person suffers repeated abdominal pain or diarrhoea both while commuting by train to school and at school.

     
  15. 15.

    During summer vacation, the person could be heard arguing, although no one else was present.

     
  16. 16.

    The person has started coming home late and disobeying their parents.

     
  17. 17.

    I think that I may get confused at times whether something I experience or perceive may be real or may be just part of my imagination or dreams.

     
  18. 18.

    The person has started eating much more meat than vegetables.

     
  19. 19.

    There is no validity in the above-mentioned items.

     

Appendix II: Reliability of basic knowledge survey

We performed a retest of basic knowledge of schizophrenia in the same manner as the first survey. We used the same questionnaire for a different sample of 735 individuals who had not been exposed to our web-based education program. Demographic characteristics of the respondents and the rates of correct answers are shown in Tables 5 and 6.
Table 5

Demographic characteristics of respondents (n = 735; second survey)

Characteristic

n

%

Age (years)

  

30-39

41

5.6

40-49

541

73.6

50-59

152

20.7

60-69

1

0.1

Gender

  

Male

389

52.9

Female

346

47.1

Education

  

Junior high school

7

1.0

High school

217

29.5

Vocational school

97

13.2

Junior college

83

11.3

University

298

40.5

Graduate school

32

4.4

Others

1

0.1

Family structure

  

2 parents

568

77.3

1 parent

27

3.7

3 generations

129

17.6

Others

11

1.5

Family income (US dollars)

  

< 11,000

14

1.9

11,000-32,000

58

7.9

32,000-53,000

167

22.7

53,000-110,000

386

52.5

> 110,000

110

15.0

Proximity to person with schizophrenia

  

Yes

32

4.4

No

703

95.6

Occupation

  

Agriculture, forestry and fisheries

3

0.4

Production labour service

175

23.8

Transportation and communication

38

5.2

Sales and marketing

94

12.8

Service industry

108

14.7

Professionals

121

16.5

Others

37

5.0

Unemployed

159

21.6

Participation in welfare activities for people with mental illness

  

Yes

49

6.7

No

686

93.3

Table 6

Rates (%) of correct answers for 14 items on basic knowledge of schizophrenia (second survey)

Item

Correct

answer

"before"

(n = 735)

"after"

(n = 628)

P

1. The incidence of schizophrenia is 1 out of 100 individuals.

True

9.7

29.9

< 0.001

2. Junior and senior high school students do not develop schizophrenia.

False

99.0

97.5

NS

3. Schizophrenia is not a mental illness.

False

92.7

91.6

NS

4. Differences in child-rearing methods are not responsible for the onset of the illness.

True

21.0

33.3

< 0.001

5. A person with a mild disposition will not necessarily develop schizophrenia.

True

24.4

28.7

< 0.05

6. Schizophrenia has been proven to be a genetic disease.

False

98.0

98.4

NS

7. A person with schizophrenia may have little will power.

False

97.7

97.3

NS

8. There is no effective medication for schizophrenia.

False

95.0

96.5

NS

9. It is not possible to recover from schizophrenia, even with treatment.

False

98.1

98.4

NS

10. Auditory hallucinations and delusions are not symptoms of schizophrenia.

False

97.4

99.2

< 0.05

11. Poor concentration and fatigue are not symptoms of schizophrenia.

False

98.6

98.4

NS

12. Social withdrawal is not a symptom of schizophrenia.

False

93.3

93.5

NS

13. The appearance and duration of symptoms can vary among individuals.

True

61.0

58.3

NS

14. All the above items are incorrect.

False

81.2

83.8

NS

Total score

 

76.2

78.9

< 0.001

The distributions of demographic characteristics are almost identical to those in Table 1 (first survey). In addition, the rates of correct answers for the 14 items are similar to those in Table 2, although there are some significant differences.

Appendix III

Table 7

Rates (%) of correct answers for 5 items on discrimination between disorders (second survey; n = 735)

Item

"before"

n = 735

"after"

n = 628

P*

Discrimination of schizophrenia symptoms

44.8%

53.3%

< 0.05

Discrimination of prodromal symptoms

26.7%

36.6%

< 0.001

Discrimination of other mental illnesses

69.6%

67.9%

NS

Discrimination of physical disorders

94.5%

91.5%

< 0.05

Discrimination of individuals who display unusual or antisocial behaviour

94.0%

91.5%

NS

*McNemar's test

Declarations

Acknowledgements and Funding

The authors thank the study participants. This work was supported by a 2010 Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22592581) entitled Investigations of the Consciousness of Parents of Junior and Senior High School Students Concerning Schizophrenia and the Development of Educational Enlightenment Media.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Niigata University Graduate, School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine

References

  1. Bechard-Evans L, Schmitz N, Abadi S, Joober R, King S, Malla A: Determinants of help-seeking and system related components of delay in the treatment of first-episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2007, 96: 206-214. 10.1016/j.schres.2007.07.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Loebel AD, Lieberman JA, Alvir JM, Mayerhoff DI, Geisler SH, Szymanski SR: Duration of psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1992, 149: 1183-1188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Marshall M, Lewis S, Lockwood A, Drake R, Jones P, Croudace T: Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients:a systematic review. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005, 62: 975-983. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.975.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chong SA, Lee C, Bird L, Verma S: A risk reduction approach for schizophrenia: the early psychosis intervention programme. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004, 33: 630-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Van J, Delespaul P: Toward a world consensus on prevention of schizophrenia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2005, 7: 53-67.Google Scholar
  6. Yamazawa R, Mizuno M, Nemoto T, Miura Y, Murakami M, Kashima H: Duration of untreated psychosis and pathway to psychiatric services in first-episode schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004, 58: 76-81. 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2004.01196.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yung AR, Killackey E, Hetrick SE, Parker AG, Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkoetter J, Purcell R, Mcgorry PD: The prevention of schizophrenia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007, 19: 633-646. 10.1080/09540260701797803.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McGorry PD, Yung AR: Early intervention in psychosis:an overdue reform. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003, 37: 393-398. 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01192.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tanaka G, Ogawa T, Inadomi H, Kikuchi Y, Ohta Y: Effects of an education program on public attitudes towards mental illness. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003, 57: 595-602. 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2003.01173.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lysaker PH, Davis LW, Warman DM, Strasburger A, Beattie N: Stigma, social function and symptoms in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: associations across 6 months. Psychiatry Res. 2007, 149: 89-95. 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.03.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Esterberg ML, Compton MT, McGee R, Shim R, Hochman K: Knowledge about schizophrenia and social distance toward individuals with schizophrenia: a survey among predominantly low-income, urban, African American community members. J Psychiatry Pract. 2008, 14: 86-93. 10.1097/01.pra.0000314315.94791.80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaebel W, Zaske H, Baumann AE, Klosterkotter J, Maier W, Decker P, Moller HJ: Evaluation of the German WPA "program against stigma and discrimination because of schizophrenia-Open the Doors": results from representative telephone surveys before and after three years of antistigma interventions. Schizophr Res. 2008, 98: 184-193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Penn DL, Kohlmaier JR, Corrigan PW: Interpersonal factors contributing to the stigma of schizophrenia: social skills, perceived attractiveness, and symptoms. Schizophr Res. 2000, 45: 37-45. 10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00213-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nishida A, Tanii H, Nishimura Y, Kajiki N, Inoue K, Okada M, Sasaki T, Okazaki Y: Associations between psychotic-like experiences and mental health status and other psychopathologies among Japanese early teens. Schizophr Res. 2008, 99: 125-133. 10.1016/j.schres.2007.11.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yamaguchi H, Takahashi A, Takano A, Kojima T: Direct effects of short-term psychoeducation intervention for relatives of patients with schizophrenia in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006, 60: 590-597. 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01563.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Stuart H: Reaching out to high school youth: the effectiveness of a video-based antistigma program. Can J Psychiatry. 2006, 51: 647-653.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Willetts L, Leff J: Improving the knowledge and skills of psychiatric nurses: efficacy of a staff training programme. J Adv Nurs. 2003, 42: 237-43. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02612.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kobayashi H, Nemoto T, Koshikawa H, Osono Y, Yamazawa R, Murakami M, Kashima H, Mizuno M: A self-reported instrument for prodromal symptoms of psychosis: testing the clinical validity of the PRIME Screen-Revised (PS-R) in a Japanese population. Schizophr Res. 2008, 106: 356-362. 10.1016/j.schres.2008.08.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Clare VL, Pat M: Who cares? Pathways to psychiatric care for young people experiencing a first episode of psychosis. Psychiatric Serv. 1995, 46: 1166-1171.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ronald CK, Patricia B, Olga D, Robert J, Kathleen RM, Ellen EW: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005, 62: 593-602. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Compton MT, Esterberg ML, McGee R, Kotwicki RJ, Oliva JR: Crisis intervention team training: changes in knowledge, attitudes, and stigma related to schizophrenia. Psychiatric Serv. 2006, 57: 1199-1202. 10.1176/appi.ps.57.8.1199.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Magliano L, Fiorillo A, Rosa CD, Malangone C, Maj M: Beliefs about schizophrenia in Italy: a comparative nationwide survey of the general public, mental health professionals, and patients' relatives. Can J Psychiatry. 2004, 49: 322-330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/323/prepub

Copyright

© Yoshii et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.