Open Access

Prevalence and characteristics of Postpartum Depression symptomatology among Canadian women: a cross-sectional study

BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201111:302

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-302

Received: 1 October 2010

Accepted: 11 May 2011

Published: 11 May 2011

Abstract

Background

This study aims to look at the prevalence and characteristics of postpartum depression symptomatology (PPDS) among Canadian women. Studies have found that in developed countries, 10-15% of new mothers were affected by major postpartum depression. Mothers who suffer from postpartum depression may endure difficulties regarding their ability to cope with life events, as well as negative clinical implications for maternal-infant attachment.

Methods

An analysis based on 6,421 Canadian women, who had a live birth between 2005 and 2006 and were part of the Maternity Experience Survey (MES), was performed. PPDS was measured based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Various factors that assessed socio-economic status, demographic factors, and maternal characteristics were considered for the multinomial regression model.

Results

The national prevalence of minor/major and major PPDS was found to be 8.46% and 8.69% respectively. A mother's stress level during pregnancy, the availability of support after pregnancy, and a prior diagnosis of depression were the characteristics that had the strongest significant association with the development of PPDS.

Conclusions

A significant number of Canadian women experience symptoms of postpartum depression. Findings from this study may be useful to increase both the attainment of treatment and the rate at which it can be obtained among new mothers. Interventions should target those with the greatest risk of experiencing PPDS, specifically immigrant and adolescent mothers.

Background

Postpartum depression (PPD) refers to a non-psychotic depressive episode that begins in or extends into the postpartum period [1, 2]. PPD can evolve from a preexisting case of the baby blues, or can become apparent after the first weeks of giving birth and can last as long as 14 months [1, 35]. Symptoms include anxiety, guilt, negative maternal attitudes, and poor parenting self-efficacy [3, 6, 7]. A multitude of treatment options for PPD exist, including interpersonal therapy and the most common treatment, pharmaceutical intervention [1, 8].

Mothers who suffer from PPD endure significant consequences, especially with their ability to cope with life events, including parenting tasks [9]. PPD elicits negative clinical implications for maternal-infant attachment; there is a withdrawn and disengaged behaviour in the mother and/or intrusive and hostile mother-infant communication [1013]. Research has shown that experiencing symptoms of PPD can have immediate ill effects on the offspring [14].

PPD is a major health concern for women from diverse cultures [15]. Internationally, the prevalence of major PPD ranges from almost 0% in Singapore to nearly 57% in Brazil [12]. In 1998, Statistics Canada reported that in Canada, 10-15% of new mothers were affected by major PPD, which is similar to prevalence rates found in other developed countries [1, 6]. However, there are no recent studies that show the overall provincial and national prevalence rates of PPD, and the few studies that have been performed show varying results, refer to specific communities that may not be representative of the Canadian population. For example, the prevalence of PPD was found to range from 4.3 to 15.2% in postpartum patients from five Ontario hospitals [16]. Similarly, in a study utilizing the EPDS, Davey et al. (2008) found that 6.5% of a cohort of medically low risk pregnant women in the Calgary Health Region displayed symptoms of minor/major PPD while 4.5% scored in the range of major PPD [6].

The range of international PPD prevalence rates may be due to cross-cultural variables, screening methods, differences in the perception of mental health and its stigma, or differences in socio-economic backgrounds [12]. Globally, predictors of PPD vary as well, however usually four main categories emerge; socio-economic, demographic, maternal and social support. Total household income has been negatively associated with the prevalence of PPD in women in cohorts in Vancouver and Calgary, Canada [6, 17]. Conversely, the risk for PPD symptomatology increased when the mother was born outside of Canada, even after adjusting for socioeconomic status [6]. Maternal characteristics that influence PPD include prior experience of depressive episodes preceding pregnancy, which has consistently been linked with the occurrence of PPD in mothers [6, 18, 19]. Previous pregnancy experience, as well as the development of a new medical condition during pregnancy has been positively associated with the onset of PPD [20, 21]. Additionally, marital stress and the lack of prenatal care have both been associated with a higher risk of PPD symptomatology [17, 18, 21]. Studies have found that the presence of low levels of social support have been linked to the development of PPD [1, 6].

Given the implications of PPD on the mother and the child, knowledge of prevalence rates and predictors are necessary to implement preventative measures and aid health practitioners in addressing at-risk groups. Few studies have been conducted examining Canadian PPD prevalence rates and predictors, and these studies have been limited to specific populations. Hence, national and provincial Canadian estimates of PPD from a single study are limited. This study aims to assess the current national and provincial prevalence rates of PPD symptomatology and the characteristics of PPD among Canadian women 15 years of age or greater.

Methods

The analysis of this study was based on data from the Maternity Experience Survey (MES), which was designed by the Maternity Experiences Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System, and sponsored by the Public Health Agency of Canada. The survey was conducted by Statistics Canada between October 23, 2006 and January 31, 2007. The MES is the first nationwide survey that assessed pregnancy, delivery and postnatal experiences of mothers and their children. The survey sample was selected from the Canadian Census of Population to include women aged 15 years and above who had singleton live births between the period of February 15, 2006 and May 15, 2006 in the provinces of Canada and between November 1, 2005 and February 1, 2006 in the territories of Canada. A total of 8,542 Canadian women were selected, out of which 6,421 responded to the survey. In the provinces, computer assisted telephone interviews were used for data collection, whereas in the territories, a personal interview with a paper version of the questionnaire was offered, if a telephone interview was not possible. The telephone interview lasted on average 45 minutes. The MES has been previously described in previous reports [22]. Privilege to use the MES was granted by Statistics Canada Research Data Centre. Additionally, screening and ethics were required from the Research Data Centre.

The main outcome of the study was defined as: postpartum depression symptomatology (PPDS) assessed by the score on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The EPDS is a comprehensive and widely used screening tool for detecting symptoms of PPD [23]. In developed countries a score of 0-9 inclusively indicates no risk of experiencing symptoms of PPD; a score of 10-12 indicates a minor/major risk of experiencing symptoms of PPD; and a score of 13 or greater indicates a major risk of experiencing symptoms of PPD [8, 23]. The sensitivity and specificity of the EPDS has been found to be 75% and 84% respectively, at a cut-off of 13 [24], and has been used and found to be valid in Canadian studies [8, 25, 26]. Major depression is defined as a clinical syndrome that has a clinical treatment process. Symptoms can include, but are not limited to, anxiety, sleep disorders, a sense of detachment from infant, irritability, and fatigue. Minor/major depression is a lesser form of major depression, where early detection and treatment can prevent further exacerbation of symptoms [7, 23]. A wide range of independent variables were investigated as potential predictors of PPDS. Socio-economic factors, such as maternal education level (less than high school, high school graduate, some post-secondary, post-secondary diploma, university graduate), household income (low, low-middle, middle, upper-middle, high), and occupation during pregnancy and demographic factors, consisting of region of residence (Atlantic, Quebec, Ontario, Prairies, British Columbia, Territories), immigration status, and the age of the infant (5 months, 6-8 months, 9-14 months) were examined. Information about maternal characteristics including parity, living with a husband/partner, maternal age at time of interview (15-19, 20-24, 25-34, 35-39, 40+), pregnancy weight gain guidelines (inadequate, recommended, excessive), previous diagnosis of depression/prescription antidepressants, smoking status during 3rd trimester of pregnancy, mother's stress level during pregnancy (very, somewhat, not), and breastfeeding initiation were explored. Finally, other variables, availability of support after pregnancy (none of the time, some of the time, most of the time), planned pregnancy, and baby in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) were analyzed. All the variables were directly self-reported by the mother. Household income was calculated based on the number of people in the household and the total household income before taxes and deductions earned by all household members from all sources in the past 12 months [27]. The pregnancy weight gain guidelines were based on the Institute of Medicine's recommendations for total weight gain during pregnancy [28]. A mother's stress level during pregnancy was based on the amount of stress reported during the 12 months prior to the baby's birth [29]. Support was defined as companionship, assistance and any other type of support that may have been required [29].

The prevalence of PPDS was estimated using population weights and examined across all the Canadian provinces and territories. At the univariate level, differences in the proportion of PPDS were assessed among the different levels of each predictor using population weights. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. All the independent variables were considered in a multinomial multivariate logistic regression analysis where the dependent variable was PPDS with the referent category being not having PPDS. Adjusted OR and 95% CI were reported for the final model. To account for the complex sampling design, bootstrapping was performed to calculate all the 95% CI estimates [30]. All analyses, in exception to bootstrapping, were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 17.0). Bootstrapping was performed using the Stata: Data Analysis and Statistical Software (Stata, version 10.1).

Results

For the present study the sample size analyzed was 6,421 weighted to represent 76,509 Canadian women. Figure 1 and figure 2 show the full range of minor/major and major PPDS prevalence rates across Canada's provinces and territories, as well as the overall national averages (8.46% and 8.69%, respectively). The rates of minor/major PPDS in Canada's provinces and territories ranged from of 4.35% in Prince Edward Island to 14.05% in the territories. Similarly, the lowest rate of major PPDS was found in an Atlantic province, New Brunswick, and the highest was found in the territories (5.03% and 15.90% respectively). Figure 3 illustrates the distribution of the total prevalence rate of PPDS among Canada's provinces and territories, with the highest prevalence rates found in the Territories (29.95%) and the lowest found in Prince Edward Island (10.89%).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-302/MediaObjects/12889_2010_Article_3127_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Distribution of minor/major PPDS across Canadian provinces and territories

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-302/MediaObjects/12889_2010_Article_3127_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Distribution of major PPDS across Canadian provinces and territories

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-302/MediaObjects/12889_2010_Article_3127_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Distribution of total PPDS (minor/major & major) across Canadian provinces and territories

Table 1 presents the estimated population and distribution of predictors of PPDS and the unadjusted associations between minor/major and major PPDS and potential predictors. Table 2 shows the adjusted associations between minor/major and major PPDS and potential predictors. Total household income, when compared to the highest total household income group, was the only significant socioeconomic variable for minor/major PPDS and major PPDS. After adjusting for the other independent variables, a prior diagnosis of depression or having been previously prescribed antidepressants remained significant for minor/major and major PPDS (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.32-2.19 and OR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.91-3.28 respectively). Interestingly, smoking status during the 3rd trimester was negatively associated with experiencing minor/major PPDS after adjusting for all other variables (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66-0.91). A mother's stress level during pregnancy showed the strongest association with both minor/major and major PPDS. The odds ratios for minor/major PPDS when being "very stressed" and "somewhat stressed" were 3.59 (95% CI: 2.58-5.00) and 2.39 (95% CI: 1.86-3.09) respectively as compared to not being stressed at all. The association was even stronger between the levels of stress and major PPDS, where mothers who were "very stressed" were 6.98 (95% CI: 4.99-9.77) times more likely to experience major PPDS and those who were "somewhat stressed" were 2.28 (95% CI: 1.71-3.05) times more likely to experience major PPDS. When analyzing the relationship between the availability of support and the development of minor/major and major PPDS, having support "none of the time" no longer remained significantly associated with minor/major PPDS after adjusting for all other variables (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 0.89-5.71), but remained significant for major PPDS (OR: 3.75, 95% CI: 1.69-8.35). Having support "some of the time" maintained a significant association with both minor/major and major PPDS (OR: 2.93, 95% CI: 2.29-3.77 and OR: 4.12, 95% CI: 3.19-5.31).
Table 1

Descriptive data & unadjusted analysis of potential predictors and minor/major and major PPDS

 

Total

PPDS (minor/major)

PPDS (major)

 

N*

%

OR

95% CI†

OR

95% CI†

Socioeconomic Factors

Maternal education level

Less than high school

5787

7.65

1.79

1.27-2.53

2.54

1.84-3.49

High school grad

10049

13.29

1.49

1.11-2.01

1.71

1.27-2.29

Some Post-Secondary

4609

6.09

1.74

1.19-2.59

1.44

0.98-2.12

Post-Secondary Diploma

28304

37.43

1.30

1.03-1.63

1.08

0.84-1.38

University

26872

35.54

1

 

1

 

Total household income

Low

2250

3.13

1.78

1.03-3.09

4.49

2.89-6.97

Low-Middle

5764

8.02

2.85

2.05-3.97

3.48

2.51-4.82

Middle

15179

21.11

1.84

1.40-2.41

2.04

1.52-2.72

Middle-Upper

24643

34.27

1.44

1.11-1.86

1.40

1.05-1.86

High

24078

33.48

1

 

1

 

Occupation during pregnancy

No

23554

30.92

1.38

1.13-1.68

2.10

1.72-2.56

Yes

52612

69.08

1

 

1

 

Demographic Factors

Region of residence

Atlantic

4521

5.91

0.53

0.39-.071

0.34

0.25-0.47

Quebec

18333

23.96

0.46

0.34-0.63

0.48

0.37-0.64

Ontario

29688

38.80

0.58

0.44-0.77

0.48

0.37-0.63

Prairies

14569

19.04

0.40

0.30-0.55

0.46

0.34-0.61

British Columbia

8997

11.76

0.52

0.36-0.75

0.41

0.28-0.59

Territories

398

0.52

1

 

1

 

Immigration status

Yes

16763

22.03

1.87

1.51-2.32

2.71

2.20-3.32

No

59337

77.97

1

 

1

 

Age of infant (months)

9-14

1709

2.24

0.39

0.23-0.65

0.43

0.25-0.74

6-8

65102

85.27

1.04

0.79-1.39

0.72

0.53-0.99

5

9534

12.49

1

 

1

 

Maternal Characteristics

Parity

Multiparous

41556

54.53

1.10

0.91-1.32

1.29

1.07-1.56

Primiparous

34647

45.47

1

 

1

 

Living with a husband/partner

No

6374

8.36

1.55

1.16-2.09

1.90

1.46-2.49

Yes

69832

91.64

1

 

1

 

Maternal age

15-19

1503

1.96

1.71

1.05-2.78

2.71

1.80-4.08

20-24

8923

11.66

1.13

0.85-1.51

1.38

1.06-1.81

25-34

12927

16.90

1

 

1

 

35-39

2963

3.87

1.32

1.04-1.68

1.33

1.05-1.69

40+

50192

66.37

1.01

0.58-1.77

1.41

0.87-2.27

Pregnancy weight gain guidelines

Inadequate

24260

32.29

0.88

0.65-1.19

0.82

0.62-1.08

Recommended

13947

18.56

1

 

1

 

Excessive

36936

49.15

1.14

0.88-1.48

0.91

0.70-1.18

Previous diagnosis of depression/prescription antidepressants

Yes

11784

15.46

2.05

1.64-2.54

2.47

1.99-3.06

No

64456

84.54

1

 

1

 

Smoking status during 3rd trimester

Smoked

8016

10.50

1.79

1.39-2.32

1.57

1.22-2.04

Did not smoke

68319

89.50

1

 

1

 

Mother's stress level during pregnancy

Very stressed

9488

12.45

3.91

2.92-5.23

7.13

5.47-9.28

Somewhat stressed

33968

44.58

2.64

2.08-3.34

2.20

1.75-2.78

Not at all

32742

42.97

1

 

1

 

Breastfeeding initiation

No

7394

9.67

1.10

0.84-1.44

1.20

0.61-1.14

Yes

69086

90.33

1

 

1

 

Other variables

Availability of support after pregnancy

None of the time

1095

1.44

4.27

2.22-8.20

7.11

4.08-12.41

Some of the time

11126

14.58

3.57

2.86-4.44

5.75

4.69-7.06

Most of the time

64076

83.98

1

 

1

 

Planned pregnancy

No

5378

7.08

1.32

0.93-1.88

1.93

1.43-2.61

Yes

70571

92.92

1

 

1

 

Baby in NICU

Yes

9733

12.74

1.30

1.01-1.68

1.10

0.84-1.44

No

66681

87.26

1

 

1

 

* Sample size is estimated using population weights

ORs in bold are significant at an alpha of 0.05

† 95% CI were calculated using bootstrapping technique

Table 2

Multinomial logistic regression analysis of minor/major and major PPDS

 

PPDS (minor/major)

PPDS (major)

 

OR

95% CI†

OR

95% CI†

Socioeconomic Factors

Maternal education level

Less than High School

1.16

0.71-1.90

1.40

0.85-2.32

High School Graduate

1.20

0.84-1.72

1.24

0.82-1.87

Some Post-Secondary

1.54

0.99-2.38

0.98

0.59-1.61

Post-Secondary Diploma

1.14

0.88-1.48

0.98

0.73-1.32

University Graduate

1

 

1

 

Total household income

Low

1.16

0.56-2.39

1.91

0.95-3.83

Low-Middle

2.11

1.39-3.20

1.79

1.14-2.82

Middle

1.60

1.16-2.21

1.47

1.02-2.12

Middle-Upper

1.39

1.05-1.85

1.38

1.00-1.91

High

1

 

1

 

Occupation during pregnancy

No

1.09

0.86-1.38

1.32

1.01-1.71

Yes

1

 

1

 

Demographic Factors

Region of residence

Atlantic

1.39

0.64-3.03

1.05

0.40-2.75

Quebec

1.33

0.62-2.87

1.28

0.51-3.21

Ontario

1.37

0.62-3.01

0.98

0.39-2.46

Prairies

1.08

0.49-2.34

0.96

0.38-2.40

British Columbia

1.25

0.56-2.80

0.86

0.33-2.27

Territories

1

 

1

 

Immigration status

Yes

1.84

1.41-2.40

2.35

1.77-3.13

No

1

 

1

 

Age of infant (months)

9-14

0.39

0.19-0.81

0.52

0.22-1.26

6-8

1.10

0.80-1.51

0.78

0.54-1.12

5

1

 

1

 

Maternal Characteristics

Parity

Multiparous

0.91

0.72-1.14

1.06

0.83-1.37

Primiparous

1

 

1

 

Living with a husband/partner

No

1.01

0.67-1.53

1.09

0.72-1.65

Yes

1

 

1

 

Maternal age

15-19

1.17

0.58-2.35

2.03

1.09-3.78

20-24

0.86

0.61-1.22

1.09

0.75-1.58

25-34

1

 

1

 

35-39

1.13

0.85-1.50

1.10

0.79-1.51

40+

0.83

0.45-1.54

0.94

0.51-1.73

Pregnancy weight gain guidelines

Inadequate

1.05

0.76-1.45

1.11

0.79-1.57

Recommended

1

 

1

 

Excessive

1.22

0.93-1.62

1.17

0.85-1.61

Previous diagnosis of depression/prescription antidepressants

Yes

1.70

1.32-2.19

2.50

1.91-3.28

No

1

 

1

 

Smoking status during 3rd trimester

Smoked

0.78

0.66-0.91

0.90

0.76-1.07

Did not smoke

1

 

1

 

Mother's stress level during pregnancy

Very stressed

3.59

2.58-5.00

6.98

4.99-9.77

Somewhat stressed

2.39

1.86-3.09

2.28

1.71-3.05

Not at all

1

 

1

 

Breastfeeding initiation

No

0.99

0.71-1.38

0.70

0.46-1.07

Yes

1

 

1

 

Other variables

Availability of support after pregnancy

None of the time

2.26

0.89-5.71

3.75

1.69-8.35

Some of the time

2.93

2.29-3.77

4.12

3.19-5.31

Most of the time

1

 

1

 

Planned pregnancy

No

0.89

0.59-1.34

0.99

0.66-1.49

Yes

1

 

1

 

Baby in NICU

Yes

1.14

0.84-1.55

0.99

0.72-1.38

No

1

 

1

 

† 95% CI were calculated using bootstrapping technique

ORs in bold are significant at an alpha of 0.05

The multinomial regression model included all independent variables listed in the table.

Discussion

This study investigated the prevalence and characteristics of minor/major and major PPDS among mothers in the Canadian provinces and territories. The national prevalence rates of minor/major PPDS and major PPDS were found to be 8.46% and 8.69% respectively. The analysis revealed an association between total household income and both minor/major and major PPDS, which was found to decrease as household income increased. Immigration status, delivery at a young age, and a prior diagnosis of depression were all found to be positively associated with both forms of PPDS. Yet, the amount of stress during pregnancy and the lack of availability of support postpartum had the highest direct association with both minor/major and major PPDS.

This study found the national prevalence rate for major PPDS to be lower (8.69%) compared to a previous report conducted by Statistics Canada in 1998 (10-15%) [1]. The lower national prevalence rate for major PPDS may partially be attributed to the timing of the EPDS survey in this study, which was administered 5 to 14 months postpartum. A meta-analysis that analyzed several international studies found, at 6 weeks postpartum, the mean American prevalence rate of PPD to be 15.4% and the mean prevalence rate in the United Kingdom to be 12.8% [12]. The higher prevalence rate of PPDS observed in the Canadian territories may partially be attributed to the population being comprised of a greater proportion of aboriginal people. Studies have shown that aboriginal people are at increased risk of suffering from depression [31]. The low minor/major and major PPDS prevalence rates found in the Atlantic provinces may be related to the reported high levels of social support [32].

The association between total household income and both minor/major and major PPDS were found to be higher with a decrease in lower income group, which has been seen previously in the literature. A meta-analysis based on 59 studies, also found that a decreased household income was associated with a greater risk for PPD [2]. This may partly be attributed to the increased amount of stress placed on a mother due to the availability of limited financial means necessary for raising an infant [2, 26]. Variation in the external environment (urban/rural) in conjunction with socioeconomic status may also affect the association found.

Immigrants were at increased odds of experiencing minor/major PPDS (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.41-2.40), and major PPDS (OR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.77-3.13) compared to non-immigrants. Consistent with this finding, a Canadian study conducted with participants from the Calgary Health Region between 2001 and 2004, report that having been born outside of Canada was associated with an increased risk of 1.87 of developing minor/major PPD (95% CI: 1.17-3.00) [6]. However, such an association may have been moderated by time since immigration, which may account for the effects of acculturation that could be present among immigrants who have spent substantial periods of time in Canada. The added stresses that accompany living in new surroundings among an unfamiliar culture, may compound the pressures that coincide with being a parent of a newborn.

Within the maternal characteristics, mothers between the ages of 15 and 19 years, a prior diagnosis of depression or past use of prescription antidepressants, smoking during the 3rd trimester, and a mother's stress level during pregnancy were all associated with experiencing PPDS. Although adolescent mothers were found to be associated with major PPDS (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.09-3.78), the literature is not conclusive when it comes to the association between maternal age and PPD; subsequently it is regarded as a possible predictor of PPD [2, 5]. However, concerning the adolescent population, higher prevalence rates of PPD have been reported [5, 7, 33].

A prior diagnosis of depression or past use of prescription antidepressants was associated with a higher odds of experiencing both minor/major and major PPDS. This substantial higher risk of PPDS is in concordance with previous literature regarding depression history independent of childbirth [2, 21, 34]. A mother's stress level during pregnancy was significantly and substantially associated with experiencing symptoms of both minor/major and major PPDS. The current literature is in agreement with the findings of the present study [2, 5, 35]. Although occupation during pregnancy, living with a husband/partner, and planned pregnancy did not remain significant in the adjusted model, their relationship with PPDS may have been partially accounted for with the significantly higher associations observed between stress and the risk of experiencing minor/major and major PPDS (OR: 3.59, 95% CI: 2.58-5.00 and 6.98, 95% CI: 4.99-9.77 respectively). Accompanying the significant results for stress during pregnancy are significant results regarding the amount of support available to the mother postpartum. Using the referent category "most of the time" for the variable of support after pregnancy garnered a significantly stronger positive relationship with minor/major and major PPDS when support was available "some of the time" compared to "none of the time". This association is seen when a lack of necessary social support is present in the form of family and friends, as well as professionals [26, 36].

This was the first national study that analyzed the national, provincial, and territorial prevalence rates of minor/major and major PPDS. An extensive list of characteristics of PPDS was examined among a diverse and representative sample of Canadian women. Conducting this study with a large sample size increased the statistical power. The current study was based on a cross-sectional survey. Information bias may be present due to the self-report nature of the MES. A few of the characteristics assessed may be affected by recall bias, such as a mother's stress level during pregnancy, whether she adhered to the pregnancy weight gain guidelines, and recalling a past history of depression and/or treatment with antidepressants. However, recall bias was limited for the measurement of PPDS, due to the fact that the EPDS refers to the past seven days. A limitation of the study was the timing of the administration of the EPDS. Since the criteria for the date of the births was different for the provinces and the territories, it created a sampling period that ranged from 5 to 14 months postpartum, which ultimately garnered conservative minor/major and major PPDS prevalence rates. Although symptoms of PPD can last up to 14 months [5], there is a chance that lower prevalence rates were observed in our study, due to the fact that symptoms of PPD may have resolved by the time the participants were surveyed. In an attempt to account for this, the adjusted model controlled for the age of the infant. As well, since the MES was conducted during the winter months in the territories, seasonal variations in prevalence of PPDS may have been present [37], which may have inflated the prevalence rates seen in the territories. The fact that a confirmatory instrument was not used in this study presents a limitation; hence the results of the study refer to postpartum depression symptomatology. A lack of evidence regarding the validity of the EPDS when administered by telephone, may result in a misclassification bias. Another factor that may have affected the results of this study was the differences between the respondents and the non-respondents. However, in order to decrease the non-response bias, weighting adjustments designed by Statistics Canada were applied to all variables in the MES. Information about the mothers' knowledge of symptoms of PPD prior to delivery, as well as knowledge of various treatment options and accessibility to them, would have benefited the current study.

Conclusions

Information from this study can aid health practitioners in addressing at-risk groups and inform prospective mothers of signs of PPDS, in order to increase both the timely attainment of treatment (i.e. antidepressants, professional psychotherapy, telephone based peer support) and the rate at which it can be obtained. Interventions that would specifically target women with a prior history of depression, less than adequate social support, are immigrant or adolescent mothers, or are experiencing high levels of stress may help to decrease the prevalence of PPDS among these populations.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

While the research and analysis are based on data from Statistics Canada, the opinions expressed do not represent the views of Statistics Canada. The authors would like to thank Public Health Agency of Canada and the staff at the York University - Statistics Canada Research Data Centre.

No funding was available for this project.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Kinesiology & Health Science, York University

References

  1. Leitch S: Postpartum Depression: A Review of the Literature. 2002, St. Thomas, Ontario: Elgin-St. Thomas Health Unit
  2. O'Hara MW, Swain AM: Rates and risk of postpartum depression-a meta-analysis. International Review of Psychiatry. 1996, 8: 37-54. 10.3109/09540269609037816.View Article
  3. Cutrona CE: Social support and stress in the transition to parenthood. J Abnorm Psychol. 1984, 93: 378-390.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Goodman JH: Postpartum depression beyond the early postpartum period. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing. 2004, 33: 410-420. 10.1177/0884217504266915.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Stowe ZN, Nemeroff CB: Women at risk for postpartum-onset major depression. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995, 173: 639-645. 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90296-1.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Davey HL, Tough SC, Adair CE, Benzies KM: Risk Factors for Sub-Clinical and Major Postpartum Depression Among a Community Cohort of Canadian Women. Maternal and child health journal. 2008
  7. Jones HW, Venis JA: Identification and classification of postpartum psychiatric disorders. Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services. 2001, 39: 23-47.PubMed
  8. Dennis C: Can we identify mothers at risk for postpartum depression in the immediate postpartum period using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale?. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2004, 78: 163-169. 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00299-9.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Misri S, Reebye P, Milis L, Shah S: The impact of treatment intervention on parenting stress in postpartum depressed mothers: a prospective study. American journal of orthopsychiatry. 2006, 76: 115-119.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Barnes DL: Postpartum Depression: Its Impact on Couples and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Systemic Therapies. 2006, 25: 25-42. 10.1521/jsyt.2006.25.3.25.View Article
  11. Dennis C, McQueen K: The relationship between infant-feeding outcomes and postpartum depression: a qualitative systematic review. Pediatrics. 2009, 123: e736-e751. 10.1542/peds.2008-1629.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Halbreich U, Karkun S: Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2006, 91: 97-111. 10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.051.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Mancini F, Carlson C, Albers L: Use of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale in a collaborative obstetric practice. Journal of midwifery women's health. 2007, 52: 429-434. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.03.007.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Kavanaugh M, Halterman J, Montes G, Epstein M, Hightower AD, Weitzman M: Maternal depressive symptoms are adversely associated with prevention practices and parenting behaviors for preschool children. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2006, 6: 32-37. 10.1016/j.ambp.2005.09.002.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Dennis CE, Stewart DE: Treatment of postpartum depression, part 1: a critical review of biological interventions. The journal of clinical psychiatry. 2004, 65: 1242-1251. 10.4088/JCP.v65n0914.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Watt S, Sword W, Krueger P, Sheehan D: A cross-sectional study of early identification of postpartum depression: Implications for primary care providers from The Ontario Mother & Infant Survey. BMC Family Practice. 2002, 3:
  17. Morrow M, Smith JE, Lai Y, Jaswal S: Shifting landscapes: immigrant women and postpartum depression. Health Care For Women International. 2008, 29: 593-617. 10.1080/07399330802089156.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Alici-Evcimen Y, Sudak DM: Postpartum Depression. Prim Care Update Ob/Gyns. 2003, 10: 210-216. 10.1016/S1068-607X(03)00052-0.View Article
  19. Evins GG, Theofrastous JP, Galvin SL: Postpartum depression: a comparison of screening and routine clinical evaluation. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2000, 182: 1080-1082. 10.1067/mob.2000.105409.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Bloch M, Rotenberg N, Koren D, Klein E: Risk factors associated with the development of postpartum mood disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2005, 88: 9-18. 10.1016/j.jad.2005.04.007.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Dennis CE, Janssen PA, Singer J: Identifying women at-risk for postpartum depression in the immediate postpartum period. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2004, 110: 338-346. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00337.x.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Dzakpasu S, Kaczorowski J, Chalmers B, Heaman M, Duggan J, Neusy E: The Canadian maternity experiences survey: Design and methods. Journal of Obstetric Gynaecology in Canada. 2008, 30: 207-16.
  23. Michigan Families Medicaid Project: Use and Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Accessed April/2011, [http://​ihcs.​msu.​edu/​pdf/​AppendixF.​1-EdinburghUseandV​alidation.​pdf]
  24. Cox JL, Chapman G, Murray D, Jones P: Validation of the edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in non-postnatal women. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1996, 39: 185-189. 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00008-0.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Clarke PJ: Validation of two postpartum depression screening scales with a sample of First Nations and Métis women. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2008, 40: 113-25.PubMed
  26. Bernazzani O, Saucier JF, David H, Borgeat F: Psychosocial predictors of depressive symptomatology level in postpartum women. J Affect Disord. 1997, 46: 39-49. 10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00077-3.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Tjepkema M: Statistics Canada. Nutrition: Findings from the Canadian Community Health Survey - Adult Obesity in Canada: Measured height and weight. 2004
  28. Institute of Medicine: Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. 2009, Accessed April/2011, [http://​www.​iom.​edu/​~/​media/​Files/​Report%20​Files/​2009/​Weight-Gain-During-Pregnancy-Reexamining-the-Guidelines/​Report%20​Brief%20​-%20​Weight%20​Gain%20​During%20​Pregnancy]
  29. Statistics Canada: Microdata user guide: Maternity Experiences Survey. 2006, Accessed April/2010, [http://​www.​statcan.​gc.​ca/​imdb-bmdi/​document/​5019_​D1_​T1_​V1-eng.​pdf]
  30. Yeo D, Mantel H, Liu TP: Bootstrap Variance Estimation for the National Population Health Survey. American Statistical Association: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. 1999
  31. Baker L, Cross S, Greaver L, Wei G, Lewis R: Prevalence of postpartum depression in a native American population. Maternal and child health journal. 2005, 9: 21-25. 10.1007/s10995-005-2448-2.View ArticlePubMed
  32. Colman R: A profile of women's health indicators in Canada. 2003, Accessed July/2010, [http://​www.​gpiatlantic.​org/​pdf/​health/​womens/​whbreport.​pdf]
  33. Morris-Rush J, Freda M, Bernstein P: Screening for postpartum depression in an inner-city population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 188: 1217-1219. 10.1067/mob.2003.279.View ArticlePubMed
  34. Halbreich U: Postpartum disorders: multiple interacting underlying mechanisms and risk factors. J Affect Disord. 2005, 88: 1-7. 10.1016/j.jad.2005.05.002.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Pearlstein T, Howard M, Salisbury A, Zlotnick C: Postpartum depression. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 200: 357-364. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.033.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  36. Letourneau N, Duffett-Leger L, Stewart M, Hegadoren K, Dennis C, Rinaldi CM, Stoppard J: Canadian mothers' perceived support needs during postpartum depression. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing. 2007, 36: 441-10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00174.x.View ArticlePubMed
  37. Hiltunen P, Jokelainen J, Ebeling H, Szajnberg N, Moilanen I: Seasonal variation in postnatal depression. J Affect Disord. 2004, 78: 111-118. 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00239-2.View ArticlePubMed
  38. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2458/​11/​302/​prepub

Copyright

© Lanes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement