The impact of disseminating the whole-community project '10,000 Steps': a RE-AIM analysis
© Van Acker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 15 July 2010
Accepted: 4 January 2011
Published: 4 January 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Jul 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Borsika A Rabin|
|23 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Ragnar Van Acker|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Borsika A Rabin|
|21 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Ragnar Van Acker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jan 2011||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jan 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-11-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.