Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The impact of disseminating the whole-community project '10,000 Steps': a RE-AIM analysis

  • Ragnar Van Acker1Email author,
  • Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij1,
  • Katrien De Cocker1,
  • Lisa M Klesges2 and
  • Greet Cardon1
BMC Public Health201111:3

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-3

Received: 15 July 2010

Accepted: 4 January 2011

Published: 4 January 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Borsika A Rabin
23 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ragnar Van Acker
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Borsika A Rabin
21 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ragnar Van Acker
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
4 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University
(2)
School of Public Health, University of Memphis

Advertisement