Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies

BMC Public Health201111:249

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-249

Received: 28 September 2010

Accepted: 19 April 2011

Published: 19 April 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan VanGeest
29 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Flora Tzelepis
28 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Cara Booker
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Cara Booker
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Cara Booker
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
19 Apr 2011 Editorially accepted
19 Apr 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-249

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
(2)
Institute for Social & Economic Research, University of Essex

Advertisement