A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies
© Booker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 28 September 2010
Accepted: 19 April 2011
Published: 19 April 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan VanGeest|
|29 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Flora Tzelepis|
|28 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Cara Booker|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Cara Booker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Cara Booker|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|11 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Apr 2011||Editorially accepted|
|19 Apr 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-11-249|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.