Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kitchen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 13 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 28 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ester Cerin |
| 11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kitchen |
| 29 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cheryl Addy |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ester Cerin |
| 30 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cheryl Addy |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kitchen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kitchen |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 25 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Kitchen |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 25 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-212 |
You can find further information about peer review here.