Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis

  • Andrea S Fogarty1,
  • Kate Holland2,
  • Michelle Imison1,
  • R Warwick Blood2,
  • Simon Chapman1Email author and
  • Simon Holding1
BMC Public Health201111:181

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-181

Received: 1 December 2010

Accepted: 24 March 2011

Published: 24 March 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Dec 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Hoebe
27 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Billie Bonevski
17 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Fogarty
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Fogarty
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
24 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-181

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health, University of Sydney
(2)
Faculty of Arts & Design, University of Canberra

Advertisement