Mortality among Norwegian doctors 1960-2000
© Aasland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 20 September 2010
Accepted: 22 March 2011
Published: 22 March 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erica Frank|
|23 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Netta Mäki|
|2 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Huijts|
|10 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giulia Cesaroni|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Netta Mäki|
|28 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Olaf Aasland|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Olaf Aasland|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Olaf Aasland|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|15 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|22 Mar 2011||Editorially accepted|
|22 Mar 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-11-173|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.