How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? a multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory
© Kegler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 4 June 2009
Accepted: 23 February 2010
Published: 23 February 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Jun 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Butterfoss|
|2 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laura Downey|
|24 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Wells|
|22 Nov 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Kegler|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Nov 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Wells|
|10 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laura Downey|
|26 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Kegler|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Kegler|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Feb 2010||Editorially accepted|
|23 Feb 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-90|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.