Social desirability and self-reported health risk behaviors in web-based research: three longitudinal studies
© Crutzen and Göritz; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 25 June 2010
Accepted: 23 November 2010
Published: 23 November 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Jun 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rainer Schnell|
|19 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexandrina Lizica Dumitrescu|
|18 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Rik Crutzen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rainer Schnell|
|18 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Rik Crutzen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Rik Crutzen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Nov 2010||Editorially accepted|
|23 Nov 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-720|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.