Social capital in relation to depression, musculoskeletal pain, and psychosomatic symptoms: a cross-sectional study of a large population-based cohort of Swedish adolescents
© Åslund et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 11 March 2010
Accepted: 20 November 2010
Published: 20 November 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Mar 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Takeo Fujiwara|
|23 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marjan Drukker|
|2 Jun 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Cecilia Aslund|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Jun 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marjan Drukker|
|17 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Takeo Fujiwara|
|14 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Cecilia Aslund|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marjan Drukker|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 Nov 2010||Editorially accepted|
|20 Nov 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-715|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.