Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of measured outcomes and direction of effect reported at the end of the study: 1 year follow-up or less, and 3-years or more (1990-2009)

From: Reduction of diabetes risk in routine clinical practice: are physical activity and nutrition interventions feasible and are the outcomes from reference trials replicable? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, year, reference #

follow-up time

Reduction in diabetes incidence

(%, OR, RR)

Incidence of diabetes

Improvement of FPG or 2 h PG in mmol/L

% participants achieving ≥ 5% weight loss

Mean weight loss

Kg

Mean reduction in WC (cm)

Results at one year or earlier

McTigue, 2009 [84]

1 year

NR

NR

NR

27% of intervention vs. 6% of controls achieved 7% weight loss

-5.2 Kg intervention vs.

+0.2 Kg control

NR

Bo, 2007 [48]

1 year

Adjusted

OR = 0.23 (0.06-0.85)

1.8% in intervention vs. 7.2% in controls

-0.26 mmol/L FPG intervention vs. +0.07 controls

OR for IFG = 0.22 (0.13-0.39)

 

-0.75 Kg in intervention vs. +1.63 Kg in controls

-2.55 cm in intervention vs. +1.96 cm in controls

Laatikainen, 2007 [83]

1 year

23% based on weight loss; 40% based on WC reduction

2.2% of IGT or IFG participants

-0.14 mmol/L

NR

-2.5 Kg

-4.2 cm

Kosaka, 2005 [49]

1 year

NR

NR

NR

NR

-2.5 Kg in intervention vs.-0.39 Kg in control

NR

Absetz, 2005 [82]

1 year

NR

6% of those meeting 4-5 goals vs. 3% of those meeting 3 or fewer goals

+0.1 mmol/L ± 0.6

12% achieved 5% weight loss

-0.8 Kg ± 4.5 Kg

-1.6 cm ± 4.8 cm

Torgerson, 2004 [80]

1 year

NR

NR

NR

72.8% in medication + lifestyle vs. 45.1% in placebo + lifestyle

-10.6 Kg in medication+lifestyle vs.

-6.2 Kg in placebo+ lifestyle

-9.6 cm in medication+lifestyle vs.

-7.0 cm in placebo+ lifestyle

Dyson, 1997 [50]

1 year

NR

NR

-0.1 mol/L in intervention vs.-0.2 mmol/L in control

NR

-0.4 Kg in intervention vs. -0.2 Kg in control

NR

Whittemore, 2009 [78]

6 months

NR

N/A

Reported no difference between groups, but no data shown

25% interv vs. 11% control

 

-0.5 cm intervention vs.

-0.1 cm control

Greaves, 2008 [86]

6 months

NR

N/A

NR

23.6% interv vs.7.2% control

Mean difference 1.3 Kg

Mean difference -1.6 cm

Barclay, 2008 [87]

6 months

NR

N/A

-0.02 mmol/L FPG intervention vs. +0.25 mmol/L control at 6 months

 

-2.73 Kg intervention vs.

-0.3 Kg control

-6.01 cm intervention vs.

-1.18 cm control

Pagoto, 2008 [14]

4 months

NR

N/A

NR

30% achieved 7% weight loss

-5.5 Kg in whole sample and -6.5 Kg in participants without comorbidities at 4 months

NR

(Laatikainen) Kilkkinen, 2007 [75]

3 months

NR

N/A

No change

NR

-2.4 Kg

-3.2 cm

Results at 6, 4 or 3 years

Eriksson, 1991 [79]

6 years

RR = 0.37 (0.20-0.68)

10% prevalence in intervention vs. 28.6% prevalence in controls

52.2% normalized 2 hr OGTT in intervention vs. 35.7% normalized in IGT non-intervention controls

NR

-3.3 Kg vs. +0.2 Kg

NR

Kosaka, 2005 [49]

4 years

67.4% reduction in intervention group

3% intervention vs. 9.3% in control

53.8% intervention vs. 33.9% in control

NR

-2.2 Kg in intervention vs.

-0.39 Kg in control

NR

Torgerson, 2004 [80]

4 years

Total intervention group 37.3%;

IGT patients 45%

6.2% in medication + lifestyle vs. 9% in placebo + lifestyle

0.1 mmol/L in medication + lifestyle vs. 0.2 mmol/L in placebo + lifestyle

52.8% vs. 37.3%

-5.8 Kg in medication vs.

3 Kg in placebo

w-6.4 cm in medication + lifestyle vs. -4.4 cm in placebo+ lifestyle

Absetz, 2009 [77]

3 years

NR

12% of those with IGT at baseline vs. 1.2% of those with normal FPG at baseline

0.0 ± 0.8 mmol/L

NR

-1 Kg ± 5.6 Kg

+0.1 cm ± 6.4 cm

  1. NR = not reported N/A = not applicable