Skip to main content

Table 4 Criteria for ranking data sources.

From: Public health triangulation: approach and application to synthesizing data to understand national and local HIV epidemics

Data type

Criteria

Program data

• Uniform data collection and reporting tool used?

 

• Frequency and timeliness of reporting

 

• Adherence to a standard operating procedure for data management?

 

• Data coverage (Number of sites included in the reporting system/total number of sites offering services)

 

• Sample size (patient, client, or product (i.e. condoms))

Surveillance data (ANC, DHS, BSS, etc.)

• Representativeness of sample for the target population (probability based?)

 

• Implementation (implemented according to protocol)

 

• Strength of the measures (biomarkers, self report, detailed behavioral indicators, knowledge)

 

• Analysis (appropriate, complete, methods detailed)

 

• Frequency and timeliness of data collection and reporting

 

• Consistency of sites/locations and populations measured over time

 

• Sample size

 

• Response rate

Special studies (qualitative)

• Sampling strategy explained in detail

 

• Interview/observation methods described in detail

 

• Implementation (methods implemented according to protocol)

 

• Analysis (appropriate, complete, methods detailed)

 

• Sample size

Special studies (quantitative)

• Representativeness of sample (probability based?)

 

• Implementation (methods implemented according to protocol)

 

• Strength of the measures (biomarkers, detailed behavioral indicators, knowledge)

 

• Analysis (appropriate, complete, methods detailed)

 

• Sample size

 

• Response rate