Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions
© Maibach et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 4 January 2010
Accepted: 1 June 2010
Published: 1 June 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Jan 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lorenzo Cecchi|
|8 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Luber|
|10 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Balbus|
|25 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Maibach|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Maibach|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|15 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|27 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Edward Maibach|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|27 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|1 Jun 2010||Editorially accepted|
|1 Jun 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-299|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.