To bite or not to bite! A questionnaire-based survey assessing why some people are bitten more than others by midges
© Logan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 28 January 2010
Accepted: 25 May 2010
Published: 25 May 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Jan 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nabie Bayoh|
|1 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerry Killeen|
|26 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - James Logan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - James Logan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|6 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - James Logan|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 May 2010||Editorially accepted|
|25 May 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-275|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.