Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Yeates |
| 30 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David P. Graham |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 30 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David P. Graham |
| 29 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Yeates |
| 11 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Tait |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Yeates |
| 9 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Tait |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Tait |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 29 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-171 |
You can find further information about peer review here.