Incidence of self-reported brain injury and the relationship with substance abuse: findings from a longitudinal community survey
© Tait et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 July 2009
Accepted: 29 March 2010
Published: 29 March 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Jul 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Keith Yeates|
|30 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David P. Graham|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David P. Graham|
|29 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Keith Yeates|
|11 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Robert Tait|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Keith Yeates|
|9 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Robert Tait|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Robert Tait|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|23 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Mar 2010||Editorially accepted|
|29 Mar 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-171|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.