Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cross-national differences in clinically significant cannabis problems: epidemiologic evidence from 'cannabis-only' smokers in the United States, Mexico, and Colombia

  • Fabian Fiestas1,
  • Mirjana Radovanovic1,
  • Silvia S Martins2,
  • Maria E Medina-Mora3,
  • Jose Posada-Villa4 and
  • James C Anthony1Email author
BMC Public Health201010:152

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-152

Received: 21 September 2009

Accepted: 23 March 2010

Published: 23 March 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raffaella Margherita Milani
18 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Swift
9 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Fabian Fiestas
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Fabian Fiestas
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Swift
2 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raffaella Margherita Milani
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
23 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-10-152

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University
(2)
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
(3)
Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Psychiatry
(4)
Ministry of Social Protection and Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca University

Advertisement