Blood glucose testing and primary prevention of diabetes mellitus type 2 - evaluation of the effect of evidence based patient information
© Genz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 15 December 2009
Accepted: 14 January 2010
Published: 14 January 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Dec 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jutta Genz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Jutta Genz|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|11 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Jan 2010||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jan 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-15|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.