'I guess my own fancy screwed me over': transitions in drug use and the context of choice among young people entrenched in an open drug scene
© Fast et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 26 January 2009
Accepted: 12 March 2010
Published: 12 March 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Jan 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claire E Sterk|
|23 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Lankenau|
|29 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Kerr|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claire E Sterk|
|22 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Kerndt|
|4 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Kerr|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Kerr|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|8 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|12 Mar 2010||Editorially accepted|
|12 Mar 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-126|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.