The quality of life of patients with genital warts: a qualitative study
© Mortensen and Larsen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 11 August 2009
Accepted: 7 March 2010
Published: 7 March 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Aug 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Woodhall|
|6 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iva Dediol|
|21 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leana Uys|
|11 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Gitte Lee Mortensen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Gitte Lee Mortensen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Mar 2010||Editorially accepted|
|7 Mar 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-10-113|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.