The validity of self-reported weight in US adults: a population based cross-sectional study
© Villanueva; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001
Received: 26 July 2001
Accepted: 6 November 2001
Published: 6 November 2001
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Jul 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jul 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Elmer Villanueva|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jul 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Sep 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Himes|
|24 Oct 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Elmer Villanueva|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Oct 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Oct 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Himes|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|6 Nov 2001||Editorially accepted|
|6 Nov 2001||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-1-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.