Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The validity of self-reported weight in US adults: a population based cross-sectional study

BMC Public Health20011:11

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-1-11

Received: 26 July 2001

Accepted: 6 November 2001

Published: 6 November 2001

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jul 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jul 2001 Author responded Author comments - Elmer Villanueva
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jul 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Sep 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Himes
24 Oct 2001 Author responded Author comments - Elmer Villanueva
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Oct 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Oct 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Himes
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
6 Nov 2001 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2001 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-1-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University

Advertisement